Sunday, 28 June 2020

What does antiracism mean for EIG?

As Ibram X. Kendi puts it “We are either supporting policies that are leading to racial inequities and injustice […] or we’re supporting policies and pushing policies that are leading to justice and equity for all.”

In recent weeks several articles on what antiracism means for investors have been published (for example in Fortune, Forbes, CNBC and Quartz). In the same vein, an article published in the Financial Post gives an overview of diversity (or lack thereof) in Board membership in Canada.

All this got me thinking about what antiracism might mean for EIG. As a first step, I’ve taken a look at our investment portfolio (both community investments and equities, 30 organisations in all) to see if the organisations we invest in are thinking about antiracism or taking any concrete actions. The results of this quick survey are below.

We’re now reflecting on whether EIG should engage more actively in this issue as a group and, if so, in what way. We’ve had some ideas, which you’ll find at the end of this article, but would really like to hear your thoughts on this. Let us know what you think.

Some of the organisations we invest in specifically set out to serve excluded and/or immigrant communities:
  • Microcredit Montreal and Fonds microcrédit are examples from our community portfolio that specifically serve immigrant and more marginalised communities, who may have difficulty receiving loans from the traditional banking sector. Similarly, Desjardins Caisse d’économie solidaire invests in initiatives such as social housing and development of an inclusive economy; and the Mennonite Economic Development Associates (MEDA) works with low income and excluded populations to support their integration into mainstream markets.
  • Stantec supports the National Organisation of Minority Architects which is dedicated to eliminating racism within the architecture profession.  

More recently, and following the murder of George Floyd and death of Regis Korchinski-Paquet, some of the organisations we invest in made specific comments or donations:


About one third of the organisations (12/30) that we invest in definitely have visible minorities on the board. More than half of Oikocredit’s board is from a visible minority, but it is an outlier in our portfolio. The other 11 organisations that I could quickly identify visible minorities on their boards are as follows[1]: Equities investments: Automatic Data Processing (1/11), Church & Dwight (1/10), Costco (1/11), Herman Miller (1/9), High Liner Foods (1/10), Interface (1/8), Scotiabank (2/12), Westport Fuel Systems (1/8) and Xylem (2/10). Community investments:  Desjardins Caisse d’économie solidaire (1/6) and Microcrédit Montréal (2/7). The other 18 organisations either don’t have visible minorities on their boards (10 by my count), or this information was not quickly apparent (8 - for instance no pictures of board readily available on their website).

Hiring and promotion practices are another angle to look at antiracism from. What does senior leadership look like? As with board diversity, it is a mixed bag. The Executive Director / CEO of MEDA and Microcrédit Montréal are women of colour. Another 9 organisations have at least one person of colour in a leadership position (Equities investments: Automatic Data Processing, Canadian National Railway, New Flyer Industries, Scotiabank, Stantec and Xylem. Community investments: Desjardins Caisse d’économie solidaire, Ecotrust Canada, and Oikocredit). The remaining organisations don’t have visible minorities among their senior management (12) or this remains unclear (7).

With that quick and incomplete portrait of our investments, here’s a list of questions we’ve been thinking about. You may well have others. We encourage you to let us know your thoughts.

  • Do you think this is a topic that EIG should engage with further? In what way?
  • Would you like to participate in a discussion with partners about the next steps for EIG?
  • Is antiracist investing something that you have been thinking about or reading about? Do you have any resources to share?
  • Are there parts of an assessment of our investments that you would like EIG to look into?
  • Do you have any comments about other aspects of the organisations that we invest in and how they relate to antiracism?

We’d be happy to get your input in whatever way you prefer:

Over to you J



[1] Note that I did a quick assessment, and may have missed people who are less visibly from visible minorities. I share my findings, because I think it gives a quick picture of the boards we invest with. 

1 comment:

  1. Here are some snippets taken from what a few of your fellow EIG partners have had to say….

    Some work is done in Canada to address first nation - indigenous communities investing - McConnell Foundation has done great work and Raven Capital as well […] In the US, the main reference is SOCAP [Social Capital Markets], see “SOCAP Announces Racial Equity Track to Advance Impact Investing Field”. [SOCAP has the] best conference on Impact Investing covering all the subjects and advancing these discussions for the last 10 years. […] I suggest that we find other academic studies to find out if we can learn from them and perhaps add some missing components to our analysis. We should talk to SHARE. There might be some articles in the Financial Analysts Journal (CFA Institute).

    I think it's important to consider leadership that is pro-equality, pro-diversity and essentially for building a better, inclusive future for all. And to consider these points when adding or maintaining an investment. Thank you [for opening this discussion] and for leading the way for us to build and support companies, organisations and projects that are working towards a fairer and more equitable future. I look forward to reading/hearing how the discussion develops.

    I agree that it is necessary to review our thinking and actions from the perspective of anti-racism and I thank you for this initiative.

    The racism studies in the literature and research have been around for decades but I don't think the world collective consciousness was previously tuned-in to how impactful and devastating the effects are.

    I totally agree we should go forward with this. […] Diversity includes: women, visible minorities, handicapped and gender diverse people. [Maybe] a short presentation which could be a catalyst for brainstorming on how we would want to go forward on these issues.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only EIG members are permitted to make comments.
À noter : seuls les membres du GIÉ sont autorisés à faire des commentaires.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.